Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Header Ads Widget

JF17 vs SU30 Comparison: Specs, AESA Radar, BVR Range & BrahMos vs PL-15 Missiles



JF17 vs SU30 MKI – A Detailed Comparison and Why the Thunder Has the Edge

In the ever-evolving arena of air combat, the comparison between the JF17 Thunder and the SU30 MKI has become a hot topic in defense circles, especially in South Asia. While the SU30 vs JF17 debate often seems like a match-up between a heavyweight and a lightweight, recent advancements in technology, particularly with the JF17 Block III, have made this a much closer contest than many assume.

This comprehensive JF17 vs SU30 comparison dives into key areas: specifications, radar systems, BVR capabilities, and missile systems — revealing why the JF17 might just hold a tactical edge.


JF17 vs SU30 Specifications: Performance on Paper

Let’s begin with a direct look at the performance stats of both jets.

Specification JF17 Block III SU30 MKI
Engine Single WS-13/ RD-93 Twin AL-31FP
Top Speed Mach 1.6 Mach 2.0
Range ~1,200 km (combat radius) ~1,500 km (combat radius)
Max Payload 7,000 kg 8,000 kg
Thrust-to-Weight ~0.99 ~1.07
Service Ceiling 55,500 ft 56,800 ft
Radar KLJ-7A AESA N011M Bars (Hybrid PESA)

While the SU30 MKI excels in raw power, speed, and payload, the JF17 was designed as a cost-effective, agile, and smart fighter. The latest Block III upgrade has brought it much closer to 4.5 generation capabilities.


JF17 vs SU30 Radar System: AESA vs PESA

One of the biggest upgrades in the JF17 Block III is its new KLJ-7A Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. It provides:

✔Better multi-target tracking

Superior resistance to jamming

Smaller radar cross-section

Compatibility with modern BVR missiles like the PL-15

In contrast, the SU30 MKI uses the older N011M Bars radar, a powerful but heavy and less agile Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) system. While still capable, it lacks the finesse and ECM resistance of newer AESA systems.

In the JF17 vs SU30 radar system battle, JF17 Block III clearly takes the edge with its more advanced, compact, and electronically secure radar.


JF17 vs SU30 BVR Capability: Range is the New King

Modern air combat is all about Beyond Visual Range (BVR) engagements — and this is where the JF17 becomes a serious contender.

JF17 and PL15 Missile

☑The PL-15 missile, paired with the AESA radar, gives the JF17 a deadly strike range of 200+ km.

It features an AESA seeker, improving accuracy and resistance to countermeasures.

SU30 MKI BVR Options

Typically equipped with R-77 (range: 80–110 km) and R-27 missiles.

These use semi-active radar or older infrared guidance, which is outdated compared to the PL-15.

In a JF17 vs SU30 BVR match-up, the Thunder can detect and fire long before the Flanker comes within range, providing a critical first-shot advantage.

SU30MKI and BrahMos Missile – Strike Power, Not Air Superiority

A major strength of the SU30 MKI is its ability to carry the BrahMos missile, a supersonic cruise missile capable of striking sea and ground targets at a range of 300–500 km.


While SU30MKI and BrahMos missile form a potent strike platform, it's important to note:

BrahMos is not an air-to-air missile.

It's best suited for long-range precision strikes on land or naval assets, not dogfights or aerial duels.

So, while BrahMos adds strategic versatility to the SU30, it doesn't tilt the scales in JF17 vs SU30 air combat.

Cost, Maintenance, and Tactical Deployment

One of the most overlooked aspects in the JF17 vs SU30 comparison is cost and maintenance.

✅SU30 MKI costs over $60–70 million per unit with high maintenance overheads.

JF17 Block III costs around $25–30 million, making it significantly more economical.

JF17 has lower maintenance, quicker turnaround, and higher availability in combat scenarios.

This makes the JF17 ideal for mass deployment, hit-and-run BVR tactics, and cost-effective aerial defense — crucial for countries with tighter defense budgets.

Final Verdict: SU30 vs JF17 – Who Has the Edge?

Feature Winner
Speed & Maneuverability SU30 MKI
Radar System JF17 Block III
BVR Missile Range JF17 (PL-15)
Strike Capability (Land/Sea) SU30 (BrahMos)
Cost & Operational Efficiency JF17
Radar Cross Section (Stealth) JF17
Electronic Warfare & Avionics JF17

While the SU30 MKI is undeniably powerful, in a modern air-to-air combat context, especially BVR-focused scenarios, the JF17 Block III offers a highly competitive edge thanks to its advanced AESA radar, long-range PL-15 missiles, and lower radar signature.


Conclusion: David vs Goliath in the Sky

In this high-tech version of David vs Goliath, the JF17 Thunder proves that air combat is no longer just about size and speed — it's about electronics, radar superiority, missile reach, and strategic agility.

The JF17 vs SU30 comparison isn't as one-sided as it once appeared. With each new upgrade, the JF17 is redefining lightweight air superiority, offering a smart and lethal alternative to legacy heavy fighters like the SU30 MKI.


You May Read This Also

Post a Comment

0 Comments